Justice League: Doom – Review

5/5 Great adaptation of a great story

Like Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Part 1, Green Lantern: First Flight and Batman: Under the Red Hood, Justice League: Doom is part of DC Comics/Warner Bros direct-to-DVD line of releases. It is based on a story from the JLA comic book called Tower of Babel.

Why the name chance? In the original JLA story, Ra’s Al Ghul builds a tower that will render all forms of communication on Earth useless. This titular plot point is dropped from the animated movie (as is Ra’s Al Ghul as the story’s villain), necessitating a title change. Not to mention that Doom sounds much more menacing.

In the animated movie, the immortal villain Vandal Savage gathers an Injustice League made up of villains of each member of the Justice League. It’s a 1-for-1 match. If Vandal Savage wanted a higher chance of success, I’m surprised he didn’t stack the odds in his favor by hiring three villains for each hero, seeing as he seems to have an abundance of resources. Hubris is clearly Savage’s kryptonite.

Clothing is Star Sapphire’s kryptonite.

If you were a fan of the Justice League cartoon from a few years ago, you will like the voice cast on this movie. Kevin Conroy is Batman. Tim Daly is Superman. Carl Lumbly is the Martian Manhunter (and also pulls double duty as the villainous martian Malefic). Michael Rosenbaum is the Flash, though here he’s playing Barry Allen instead of Wally West. Susan Eisenberg plays Wonder Woman. A big addition to the cast is Nathan Fillion as Green Lantern. Fillion played Green Lantern in Green Lantern: First Flight, so it was nice to see him reprise the role here.

If I were to nitpick any part of the film, it would be Mirror Master’s heist of the Batcave. The motion sensors didn’t detect him because he was in hologram mode, but that device he attached to the Bat-Computer wasn’t intangible. It should have set off alarms. Someone as paranoid as Batman would have his motion detectors set to detect something smaller than a human, right? Or maybe Batman has his motion detectors tuned to weed out small objects. Otherwise, the bats would be setting off the alarms constantly. In that case, ignore my nitpick.

Actually, none of the Injustice League is a fan of much clothing.

Overall, I liked this animated feature a lot. It kept the biggest aspect of the JLA: Tower of Babel story, namely that the Justice League is betrayed by one of their own. I wonder if Bruce Timm and Andrea Romano had to change the villain from Ra’s to Vandal Savage because Christopher Nolan was planning on using Ra’s in The Dark Knight Rises. At New York Comic Con this year, Bruce Timm mentioned that Nolan’s plans to incorporate parts of The Dark Knight Returns into his movies put on hold that particular animated film.

If Bruce and Andrea decide to go back to the JLA series for another animated film, I hope they base one on Grant Morrison and Howard Porter’s Rock of Ages storyline. I’m still not sure if I understood that story completely, but it was awesome! Green Arrow firing the Atom into Darkseid’s brain may be one of favorite comic book moments ever!

Oscars Rage!!

What!? Are you kidding me?!

Pardon the rage. The Oscar nominations came out today. I don’t always agree with the nominations, but this year seems particularly egregious.

I have four major problems with this year’s Oscar nominations:

Ben Affleck gets snubbed for Directoring. I was shocked to find out Ben Affleck wasn’t nominated for Directoring. Did you see Argo? If you did, I’m guessing it’s easily in the top five movies you saw this year. It is the best of the movies I’ve seen that was nominated for Best Picture, and the second best movie I’ve seen this year. After seeing the Best Picture nominees, Argo seemed like a shoe-in for the Best Picture winner. But the last time a movie won Best Picture without the director being nominated for Directoring was Driving Miss Daisy in 1989.

I would definitely nominate Ben Affleck for Argo over Steven Spielberg for Lincoln. And I’d give Ben the award too.

Lincoln gets 12 nominations. Lincoln was a good movie. It was not a great movie. Daniel Day Lewis was awesome in it and deserves to win Actor in a Leading Role. He deserves every bit of praise he gets for playing Lincoln.

But Tommy Lee Jones? No way. I loved Tommy Lee Jones in Lincoln, but that’s because I love Tommy Lee Jones, and in Lincoln, Tommy Lee Jones was playing Tommy Lee Jones as a senator. Tommy Lee Jones is the new Jack Nicholson. You can put him in any role you want, but chances are you’re going get Tommy Lee Jones playing Tommy Lee Jones. Like I said, I love Tommy Lee Jones, but I don’t think he should have been nominated.

I saw three movies that Joseph Gordon Levitt was in this year. Out of the three, Lincoln came in third place. I don’t think Lincoln should have been nominated for Best Picture. It was good, not great. Its spot could easily have gone to Looper, the best JGL movie of 2012. But…

Looper was completely snubbed. Best movie of the year. Zero nominations. At the very, very least, it should have been nominated for Best Picture and Writing: Original Screenplay.

Wreck-It Ralph deserved a Best Picture nomination. I thought we were past the days of great animated movies being stuck in the Animated Feature Film ghetto. Wreck-It Ralph was awesome. It lived up to its name and wrecked it. It wasn’t technically a Pixar film, but for all intents and purposes, it was a Pixar movie. And like all Pixar movies that don’t have the word Cars in their title, it rocked. But then again, so did Argo and Looper and the Academy was more than happy to short all three of these movies in favor of gushing over “I’m at least a half hour too long” Lincoln.

I’m watching the 18th Annual Critics Choice Awards while I write this rant. Affleck walked off the stage with the Best Director award. Looper won earlier for best Sci-Fi/Horror Movie. Maybe the Academy should have waited a few days before they released their imperfect list of nominees.

Les Miserables – Review

4/5 – Russell Crowe cost Les Miserables one star more

After The Dark Knight Rises, Les Miserables was the movie I was most excited for in 2012. The countdown  began months out, once the first trailer was released. It was that trailer that really made me excited for the movie. Watching Anne Hathaway, as Fantine, singing I Dreamed a Dream over shots of the movie, my expectations were raised. If the rest of the movie looked and sounded as good as this trailer, this was easily going to be my movie of the year.

As it turns out, I Dreamed a Dream is the best song in the movie. The producers were smart to put that in the trailer. I’m guessing it put many more people in the seats than Russell Crowe’s rendition of Stars.

I liked this film version of Les Miserables a lot. I’ve now seen it twice. The first was on Christmas Day (which made that Santa scene feel a bit awkward). I think Anne Hathaway is a shoe-in for Best Supporting Actress at this year’s Oscars. She was easily the best part of this movie not named Colm Wilkinson. I’ve never heard I Dreamed a Dream the way she sings it. In every previous rendition of it, it’s been a showcase for the singer’s voice, but no one ever sang it with the overwhelming despair that Hathaway infuses in it. When she finally gets to “I always dreamed my life would be so different from this hell I’m living,” you are seeing a woman at the end of her rope. This is Fantine at rock bottom.

Rock. Bottom.

Eddie Redmayne really impressed me as Marius. Going into the movie, he just looked like a guy with a goofy smile and silly hair. But he made Marius work very well. I loved his and Amanda Seyfried’s version of A Heart Full of Love. He’s adorable. When Eddie says “I’m doing everything all wrong”  might be the cutest part of the movie.

I want your hair.

After seeing her in the Les Miserables 25th Anniversary Concert, I was excited to find out that Samantha Barks would be reprising the role of Eponine in the movie. She sounded great in the movie and acted well too. She sings On My Own much more subtlety here than she does on stage. It works. Somehow the filmmakers managed to make her not look drop-dead gorgeous, which can’t be an easy feat.

Before.
After.
Okay, she still looks great.

I thought both actresses who played Cosette were excellent. Isabelle Allen was wonderful as Young Cosette. Her version of Castle on a Cloud was really good, especially when she went from singing to whispering. I’ve heard people complain about Amanda Seyfried’s singing, but I thought she sounded good and was paired well with Eddie Redmayne.

I’m of two minds on Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter as Thenardier and Madame Thenardier. They were funny, and at the second screening I attended, the audience laughed very loudly during their scenes. On the other hand, at some points, I found their slapstick to be a little too over the top.

The biggest disappointment in the cast is definitely Russell Crowe as Javert. Every time he sings, my reaction is “No.” This was just bad casting. His voice is not strong enough to carry Javert’s part. He definitely cost this movie a star in my rating. How did his versions of Stars and Javert’s Suicide make the soundtrack, but Samantha Barks and Eddie Redmayne singing Little Fall of Rain was left off?

“And I’m…”
“Shut yo’ mouth! No, really, shut your mouth.”

Without a doubt the best casting decision was to bring in Colm Wilkinson, the original Jean Valjean, as the Bishop. It was a pleasure hearing him sing in the movie. The only downside is that when he is singing alongside Hugh Jackman, it really is apparent how much stronger a singer he is over Jackman.

Also in the movie is Frances Ruffelle, who originated the role of Eponine in London and on Broadway. She plays Whore #1 in the movie. I didn’t catch her appearance either time I watched the movie. Well, now I have an excuse to see it a third time.

Overall, I really liked this version of Les Miserables. My top 5 performers would be:

5. Amanda Seyfried – Cosette
4. Samantha Barks – Eponine
3. Eddie Redmayne – Marius
2. Anne Hathaway – Fantine
1. Colm Wilkinson – The Bishop

Hugh Jackman almost cracked the list at the number five spot. I enjoyed his performance a lot in the movie and thought he was a great Jean Valjean, but his singing voice just seemed to whither during some parts. He wasn’t able to adequately anchor my favorite song in the musical, One Day More, but maybe I’m just used to hearing a booming Colm Wilkinson or Alfie Boe performing that song.

According to IMDB, Hugh Jackman went without water for 36 hours to achieve his gaunt look as a prisoner.

I liked that later on in the movie Jean Valjean still had the silver candlesticks that the Bishop gave him. You see them with lit candles in them at Valjean and Cosette’s home, and he packs them in a bag when they’re fleeing. Since the Bishop giving him the candlesticks and not turning him into the authorities were what enabled Valjean his freedom, I thought it was very cool that he still had them, as a reminder of that pivotal night.

Aaron Tveit looks a lot like TJ Miller as Enroljas. I  kept expecting him to yell out, “Paris, yeah!”

“PARIS, YEAH!!”

Near the end of the movie, there were three small, but significant changes from the stage version that I caught.

When Valjean is nearing the end of his life, he no longer is greeted by both the ghosts of Fantine and Eponine. Here, he is just greeted by Fantine. This makes complete sense, as Valjean never met Eponine when she was alive.

When Jean Valjean gives his note of last confession to Cosette, he says “it is the story of one who turned from hating a man who only learned to love when you were in his keeping.” But in the stage version, the confession is “the story of those who always loved you. Your mother gave her life for you then gave you to my keeping.” I’m not sure which line I like better. The new line makes sense, especially with the addition of the new song, Suddenly, earlier in the movie. But it did throw me off as I was mouthing along to the lyrics.

It wasn’t until the second time I saw the movie that I noticed that in the final scene, with all the dead singing the Epilogue, a song advocating moving towards the future in peace and trading swords for plowshares, that all the French soldiers who died in the battle at the barricade were left as dead bodies at the foot of the barricade. They were just doing their jobs.Why couldn’t these guys get a spot of the barricade of ghosts? I don’t think Javert was singing on the barricade either at the end. I remember him being there in the stage version, but I could be wrong. Russell Crowe would probably have sounded best here, with a horde of singers drowning him out.

Overall, I really enjoyed Les Miserables and recommend seeing it. But, if you’re going to buy the movie soundtrack afterwards, do your ears a favor and skip the movie soundtrack for the Original London Cast Recording. I own both. The movie soundtrack is pretty good, but nothing beats the Original London Cast.

The Perks of Being a Wallflower – Review

4/5 – Highly recommended

The Perks of Being a Wallflower, as it turns out, is not the life story of Jakob Dylan.

Perk #1: Being on the cover of Rolling Stone

Watching The Perks of Being a Wallflower took me back to my own high school days. I wasn’t in with the popular crowd. I wasn’t very athletic and didn’t have the musical ability to cut it in marching band (but even if I did, their cult-like demeanor would have kept me away. That and the hazing). I definitely felt like Charlie. And like Charlie, it was meeting a small group of friends with whom I would end up spending most nights hanging out that opened up my world and made high school much more enjoyable and much more interesting. I only wish that like Charlie, I had befriended these people my first year of high school instead of my third.

Emma’s back!
Emma Watson is back and out of her wizard robes. Her character, Sam, is very different from Hermione, and not just because Sam doesn’t wield a magic wand or ride on the backs of hippogriffs. I think Emma really showed off her acting talent here, playing a heavy role with heart. I hope this means we see Emma Watson in more movies. The only knock I have on her performance is she cannot do an American accent at all. Wait, was she trying to sound like Mia Sara in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off? If so, well played Ms. Watson, as Ms. Sara is an American.
I always thought Mia Sara was British or Aussie. 
Nope. Born in Brooklyn.

I really enjoyed The Perks of Being a Wallflower. I think it has the potential to be this generation’s The Breakfast Club. Ironically, the characters look like they could be extras in The Breakfast Club.

I wasn’t sure when The Perks of Being a Wallflower took place when I watched it. I assumed it was the early-to-mid 80s based on everyone’s clothing and hairstyles, but then again, maybe it’s taking place in the present and these are the most hardcore hipsters Pittsburgh has ever seen. I was surprised to find out that it takes place in 1990-91. That isn’t how I remember people dressing in 1990. Then again, I didn’t enter high school for a couple of years after that, so I guess I shouldn’t go by what I remember as middle school fashion from 1990 to be my guide.

All day. Every day.

At this point, it may be hard to find The Perks of Being a Wallflower in a theater near you, but once it’s released on DVD I highly recommend seeing it.

In case you needed a reason to watch The Perks of Being a Wallflower.

The Help – Review

4/5 – The Help is kind. The Help is smart. The Help is important.

Okay, I know, I’m a little late to the party on The Help. It was one of the few Oscar nominees that I didn’t see in time for the Oscars. I waited for the DVD (and then some) before finally sitting down to watch it. I’m not sure what caused my hesitation. I think the poster just made it look a little too chick-lit like for my taste.

I was wrong. The Help is definitely not too chick-lit. The movie tells the story about some very heartwarming and bittersweet relationships between the woman who raise southern girls in the place of the girls’ mothers, and the dynamic shift that takes place when those girls grow up to be their former caretakers’ employers.

The movie has a lot of heart. If you enjoy the television series versions of Friday Night Lights or Parenthood, I would recommend The Help.

The Help also has it’s fair share of thrills. No, there aren’t any crazy chase sequences, but there are a few scenes involving the outcome of a horrible, but very justifiable prank that will keep the viewer very engaged.

As I was watching The Help, I couldn’t help but think that southern racists are kind of like Nazis, in that they’re a very easy go-to Hollywood villain. The southern racist and the Nazi are both easily reduced to being one-note villains in movies. They come on screen and you know they’re evil. But The Help does a good job of making each of the racist white women who make up the bulk of the film’s antagonists individuals and not reducing them to cookie cutter copies of each other.

Bryce Dallas Howard, in particular, stands out as the ruthless Hily Holbrook. At no point while watching The Help did I feel like Hily came from a cookie cutter. Bryce turned Hily Holbrook into a new classic movie villain. She played her perfectly, in that I hated Hily every time she was on screen and now am kind of afraid of Bryce Dallas Howard.

Look upon the face the evil!

If you rent the DVD, watch the extras that follow. It’s a rarity for me to ever recommend watching DVD extras, but those included with The Help are worth it, just to hear the remarkable story connecting actress Octavia Spencer,  writer/director Tate Taylor and novelist Kathryn Stockett.

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows – Review

2/5 – Watch Sherlock on BBC instead!

I really enjoyed the first Robert Downey Jr Sherlock Holmes movie. I wasn’t expecting much from it and it blew away all my expectations. I was quite excited when it was announced there would be a sequel. Unfortunately, the sequel, Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, is as disappointing as the first film was entertaining.

My SPOILER-filled reasons for not liking the movie come after this photo of Holmes and Watson.

The movie isn’t completely without its merits. Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law have very good chemistry as Holmes and Watson. Holmes’s urban camouflage was great, and definitely my favorite part of the movie. And hey, who can complain about casting Stephen Fry as Mycroft!

But overall, the movie was a bad combination of slow and confusing. I didn’t realize that Rachel McAdams’s character, Irene Adler, was dead until long after her onscreen demise. It wasn’t a great loss, killing off Adler. She and Holmes didn’t have much chemistry in the first movie in my opinion. But Holmes’s chemistry with the woman she was replaced with, Noomi Rapace’s Madam Simza Heron, wasn’t any better.

It took far too long for me to realize Noomi Rapace was
 replacing Rachel McAdams as the new “Holmes Girl.”

The third Sherlock Holmes movie is currently in the works. Hopefully the producers solve the mystery of the failed sequel in time to save this franchise.

Lincoln – Review

After a brief stop at Shake Shack after seeing Wreck-It Ralph, we headed back to the theater and caught Lincoln.
In the battle of movies I saw that night, Wreck-It Ralph was the clear winner over Lincoln.
I was excited for the cast of Lincoln. I thought that Daniel Day Lewis was perfect as Abraham Lincoln. I thought Joseph Gordon Levitt was great as Lincoln’s eldest son. I loved Tommy Lee Jones in the movie. His character was actually my favorite in the movie.
I also really loved the way handled Lincoln’s assassination. It was done from a very different and unexpected point of view.
But the story was kind of on the boring side. There was a part of the movie where I realized I had just glazed over during the scene completely. It was during one of the “we need to convince this guy to vote our way” scenes. I have no idea how they convinced him. I came to just in time to find out they did. Just thinking about that scene as I type this is putting me back to sleep…
I was more interested in Tommy Lee Jones’s character, Thaddeus Stevens, than I was in Abraham Lincoln. If the movie was his story, I think I would have been much more entertained. Sure, there would have to be a title change, but that’s a small price to pay to be entertained. Bring on the Thaddeus Stevens movie!
This guy rocks!
One of the most fascinating parts about the movie was who were the abolitionist and who were pro-slavery. I always thought it was a north-south divide, and figured the loudest abolitionists would be from the far northern states, and the pro-slavery guys would be the southern-border states. But the loudest person pro-slavery was a Representative from New York. Being a native New Yorker, that kind of bummed me out
As for me not being able to really get into the movie, I guess I should have taken it as a bad sign for the movie when in the opening scene, I hoped that the camera followed the black union soldier that was talking to Lincoln instead of staying on Lincoln. Even that early on, I subconsciously had the feeling that the side characters would be more interesting than the title character of the film.
Oh, and where were the vampires?

Wreck It Ralph – Review

5/5 – Wreck-It crushes it!
Man, the people at Pixar outdid themselves with Wreck-It Ralph. Don’t dismiss this movie because it’s aimed at children. This is a must-see!
Wait, did I say Pixar? Hmm, it turns out this is a Disney release, not Pixar. It’s kind of weird that Pixar gave us a princess movie this year and Disney gave us the movie from an unusual POV. Pixar is known for movies told from the point of view of bugs, toys, etc., and Disney is known for Princess movies. John Lasseter produced Wreck It Ralph, which give it Pixar status in my mind.
But, back to the movie…Ralph is a videogame villain from the 8-bit era, who is growing tired with his lot in life. When he expresses it, people are worried that he’s “going Turbo.” I wondered what that meant at first. My best guess was that it was a Street Fighter reference. I was wrong.
M. Bison has nothing to do with “going Turbo.”

Wreck-It Ralph should be required viewing in every screenwriting class. It’s tightly paced, has great character development, and everything pays off. Everything that happens in acts two and three is deftly set-up earlier in the movie.
Bad-Anon! This is just genius!

It was fun spotting all the cameos in Wreck It Ralph, like the characters from Dig Dug and Sonic the Hedgehog. Sadly, my all time favorite 80s video game character, Mr. Do, was nowhere to be found.

These posters are awesome!

There’s a Wreck-It Ralph iPad game that is a bargain at $0.99. You get Fix It Felix, Jr., a Smash TV-esque shooter starring Jane Lynch’s character, and a Ralph game that has him trying to get as high as possible in the candy cane trees. What do you call those types of games where your goal is just to shoot yourself higher higher to get points? Is that a genre now? There seem to be a bunch of variations on that idea in the app store. On another note, the game says a Turbo racing game is coming soon. I hope that’s true.

21 Jump Street – Review

5/5 – Watch this movie!

When I first heard that 21 Jump Street, that beloved series from my youth, was being remade into a movie starring Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill, I was more than leery about it. I was positive it would like the new GI Joe and Transformers movies and would take a giant dump on a TV show I loved as a kid.

I skipped it in the theaters and didn’t give it a second thought when it came out on DVD. But then, slowly, I kept hearing from friends whose opinions I trust that this movie is hilarious. Setting aside my trepidation, I rented 21 Jump Street.

My friends were right, this movie is hilarious.

I’m guessing there are a lot of guys who graduated in the late 90s
 who get to look back on this unfortunate look in their yearbook photo.

21 Jump Street is a great comedy. If you want to laugh, and laugh hard, for an hour and 49 minutes, rent this movie. It’s a movie that doesn’t take itself too seriously. There are a few meta jokes about current 80s revival and about the previous incarnation of Jump Street. Directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller also use title cards to a very funny effect. The title cards might be my favorite thing about this movie.

Awesome unicorn!

It’s crazy how much Dave Franco looks and sounds like his older brother James. Is he a clone? Has anyone seen his birth certificate? I’m guessing clone.

Project DAVE: The first human clone.

SPOILERS after the title card…you’ve been warned…

How awesome was it that Johnny Depp and Peter DeLuise reprised their roles as Officers Tom Hanson and Doug Penhall? I was excited when Holly Robinson showed up early in the movie, but the cameo by these two guys near the end was perfect! It’s too bad they won’t be in the sequel…
Fuck yeah, motherfucker!!!

Looper – Review

5/5 – Go see this movie now!

I want to see Looper again; it’s that good. If you haven’t seen Looper yet, do yourself a favor and see it before it leaves the theater. It is my new favorite movie of 2012.

I’m going to spoil major story points in this review, so don’t read any further until after you’ve seen Looper.

Seriously, don’t go any further if you haven’t seen the movie.

Part of what I loved about Looper was the fluidity of who was the hero in the story. Here, I’m considering it necessary to be selfless in order to be considered a hero. If a character acts in his own self-interest, he’s an antihero as best.

Young Joe does a heroic act early in the film when he hides Seth after Seth fails to close his loop. Young Joe is putting his life in danger here. But he quickly sells Seth when his own savings are threatened by his boss as the price for his silence. Seth comes to a gruesome end, largely to Joe’s fault.

When Old Joe returns to the past, he quickly appears to be more heroic than Young Joe. His heroic quest is to come back in time and kill the Rainmaker as a child. The Rainmaker, besides being the criminal kingpin of the future, was behind the killing of Old Joe’s wife and countless others, and sent Old Joe back to the past to be killed by his younger self. Remember the old “If you could go back in time and kill Hitler as a baby, would you do it?” question? That’s Old Joe’s quest in a nutshell. How could you be opposed to that? He is clearly the hero at this point in the movie.

I sometimes want to do this to my younger self.

But Old Joe falls from the heroic path with relative ease. When they’re sitting in the diner, Old Joe tells Young Joe that he wants to kill the Rainmaker in order to save his wife in the future. But Old Joe refuses to show Young Joe his wife’s photo when Young Joe says that if he see it, he’ll make sure he never talks to her when he sees her for the first time in Young Joe’s future/Old Joe’s past. If they never meet, they’ll never marry and she won’t be murdered. Sure, Young Joe isn’t doing this to be altruistic. Young Joe hates Old Joe. He sees his living as being a block to his future happiness. If he can kill his future self, maybe Young Joe can get back in good with his mob employers. Old Joe won’t let him see his wife’s photo. Old Joe wants it all. He wants to kill the Rainmaker as a child and change the future, but he also wants to hold onto his personal future with his wife. If he was truly selfless and concerned with his wife’s safety over his own, he would show Young Joe his wife’s picture. Old Joe does have a good motivation for this. He views his wife as his savior. With her help, he kicked the junk, mellowed out and found true happiness for the first time in his life. He can’t picture his life without his wife.

The far more damning act to Old Joe’s heroism is when Old Joe kills the first child. Director Rian Johnson used a much more interesting take on the “Would you kill Hitler as a baby?” question when he added in the twist that Old Joe has it narrowed down to three possible children that may grow up to become the Rainmaker. “Would you kill up to two innocent children if it meant also being able to kill Hitler as a child?” is a much harder question to answer. I liked that Old Joe was clearly pained by his killing of the first child. It stopped him from losing all sympathy and just coming across as a complete Terminator-esque monster. But he’s definitely on his way to being a monster.

The second child on Old Joe’s hit list turns out to be the daughter of Suzie, the stripper/prostitute that Young Joe is infatuated with at the beginning of the movie. Young Joe cares for Suzie. He offers Suzie enough money to take care of her and her kid. But Old Joe is perfectly willing to kill Suzie’s child if that prevents the Rainmaker from coming into being. Old Joe does pause at first when he realizes his next target is Suzie’s child, but decides to go through with it. At this point, he knows that Young Joe is guarding Cid, the final child, on the farm. If he still cared for Suzie, he could save Suzie’s child for last. If Cid is the one destined to be the Rainmaker, then Suzie’s child won’t have to die if he changed up the order of who he kills. But doing so could put his mission into jeopardy. Old Joe sees himself as having a much higher chance of success killing Suzie’s child here than he does succeeding at the farm. I think Old Joe realized there was a very good chance he wasn’t returning from the farm, and that infiltrating the city a second time would be difficult, so he decides to kill Suzie’s child now to play it safe. It’s only Kid Blue setting of a trap for Old Joe in Suzie’s apartment that keeps Suzie’s child alive.

When Young Joe arrives at the farm, he hasn’t undergone his heroic transformation yet. He’s there to kill Old Joe when Old Joe shows up. He even tells Sara that he doesn’t care at all about her or Cid. His interactions with the two of them, and his viewing of Sara’s motherly love for her son does awaken something inside Young Joe. When Sara stands between Old Joe and Cid, willing to sacrifice herself for her son’s survival, something is awakened in Young Joe. Previously, Young Joe would help people as long as it didn’t cut into his well being. But Sara’s love for Cid inspires him to make the ultimate sacrifice. He shoots himself point blank through the chest in order to prevent his future self from killing an innocent woman.

In Old Joe’s defense, this kid is seriously creepy.

In that moment when he shoots himself, Young Joe explains that he realized Old Joe would be creating the Rainmaker instead of preventing him from existing. Cid would escape, embittered by the loss of two mothers and use his smarts and powers to become the Rainmaker. By killing himself, he’s both saving Sara’s life, and the hope that she can raise Cid right so that he doesn’t grow up to be the Rainmaker.

But did Young Joe really prevent the Rainmaker from coming into being by killing himself? Remember, in the original timeline, Young Joe grows up to become Old Joe after successfully closing his loop as originally intended. Old Joe is originally never given the chance to orphan Cid, so Joe isn’t integral in Cid becoming the Rainmaker. But, here is why I think Young Joe succeeded. At the end of the movie, when Sara and Cid reunite, he calls her mom. Before this, he’s always called her Sara, never acknowledged her as his mother, and told Young Joe that she’s a liar. But something changed when Sara stood between Old Joe and Cid, and Young Joe sacrificed himself. That change of calling her mom instead of Sara is tiny, but it’s huge. Sure, something could happen down the road that causes Cid to fall to the dark side, but at this moment, he has the best chance of growing up a hero instead of a villain. His powers and his outbursts make him a scary child, but he tells Young Joe he wants to protect people. I think Cid is now on the path to becoming more Superman and less Lex Luthor.

You know what would be really messed up? If it was Suzie’s child all along.

At some point before he becomes Old Joe, Young Joe apparently becomes Neo.

In a different (and I also think worse) movie, Young Joe and Old Joe would team up to take of the mob of the future down in Young Joe’s present. Instead, Rian Johnson has given us a much richer experience with his Looper.